Seismic record analysis can reveal a glacier’s past
Rod Boyce

The history of earthquake-like signals created by the crashing of glacial ice into the ocean can reveal how a glacier has changed over time, according to research by a University of Alaska Fairbanks team.

Their study focused on Alaska’s Columbia Glacier, which flows into Prince William Sound and is one of the state’s fastest-retreating glaciers (Figures 1 and 2). The researchers reviewed a catalog of about 16,000 seismic events from two dozen Alaska glaciers, including Columbia.

The Alaska Earthquake Center has recorded these glacier-related seismic events for decades as part of its routine earthquake monitoring.

The team analyzed 20 years of Columbia Glacier’s seismic activity to learn what these signals can reveal about changes in the glacier and the conditions that drive them. The glacier has been retreating since the early 1980s after approximately 200 years of stability.

The findings were published March 22 in Geophysical Research Letters.

Doctoral student Sebin John of the UAF Geophysical Institute is the lead author. Co-authors include Alaska Earthquake Center Director Michael West and physics professor Martin Truffer of the Geophysical Institute and UAF College of Natural Science and Mathematics.

“We can look at long-term trends across many glaciers and gain valuable insights into climate change and its effects in Alaska,” John said. 

Glacier calving, when chunks of ice break off and fall into the water, causes most glacier quakes. The largest events can be detected hundreds of kilometers away.

The researchers found several links between seismic activity and glacier conditions.

One factor is glacier thickness. Columbia Glacier was about 100-115 feet (30 to 35 meters) thicker in the 2010s than in the 2020s. When the glacier was thicker, pieces of ice that broke off had farther to fall, producing stronger seismic signals.

They also found that rising sea surface temperature and increased precipitation correspond with more glacier quakes.

“If the ocean is warmer and the glacier sits in the water, it can melt the glacier from below,” John said. “Heavy rainfall can also send water through the glacier and into the ocean, which helps undercut the ice.”

The frequency of calving also tracked changes in how fast the glacier moved. After 2018, Columbia Glacier sped up.

“That matches the steady rise in seismic activity,” John said. “More ice was moving through the front of the glacier.”

Another key factor is the water depth at the front of the glacier.

In shallow fjords, calving usually happens when blocks of ice break off the glacier’s face. Because much of the ice sits above the water, these blocks can fall from high up and hit the water with force, creating strong seismic signals (Figure 3).

In deep fjords, the glacier’s front often floats or nearly floats. Calving happens less often but produces larger icebergs. Because the ice is already supported by water, these events are quieter and create weaker seismic signals.

“When we started this research, we didn’t expect the depth of the water to play such a big role,” John said. “It was surprising at first, but it makes sense.”

The team’s method can also help scientists understand the history of other glaciers.

“This research is trying to answer the question of, ‘What can we learn about the dynamics of the glacier from this long-term data, which rarely exists?’” John said. (Figure 4) “Columbia Glacier shows that the Alaska record of glacier quakes holds valuable information.”

 

Learn more 

What is causing seismicity near Mt. Ogden in Southeast Alaska?

Muldrow Glacier 

2024 Seismicity Year in Review

Satellite image of Columbia Glacier and fjords, with features labeled West Branch, Main Branch, Rocky outcrop, Great Nunatak, and Heather Island. The mountains show as dark green with white on the peaks, fjord water is blue-green, glacier is white with dark lines strechting the length of the glacier.

Figure 1. A labelled satellite image shows Columbia Glacier with its Main Branch and West Branch flowing into a blue-green fjord, alongside features including a rocky outcrop, Great Nunatak, and Heather Island. Photo courtesy of NASA.

Photo of face of Columbia Glacer with dark mountains in the background and blue-gray water in front. The top of the glacier is a rough, dirty gray while the face where chunks have broken off is pale blue and white.

Figure 2. A wide view of Columbia Glacier shows a broad river of ice flowing between dark, rocky mountains, with floating ice in the water at the glacier’s toe. Photo courtesy of Martin Truffer.

Cartoon top panel depicts side view of glacier that is floating at the terminus with calving ice floating away. Cartoon bottom panel depicts side view of glacier that is supported by land at the terminus, with a calving piece creating pressure waves in the water and seismic waves in the ground.

Figure 3. Conceptual model of two calving mechanisms. (a) Calving in deep water while the glacier is near-floating, which does not generate appreciable seismic energy (at least for Alaska glaciers), as the ice gently drifts away. (b) Calving from a grounded glacier, which produces seismic energy through pressure waves generated by cavity collapse following icefall. Geophysical Research Letters

Three panel graphic: Top is map with seismic stations shown as red triangles, and weather station shown as green circle. Middle panel: Dots representing glacier quakes color coded by year, showing the glacier's retreat between 2005 and 2024. Bottom panel: map showing water depth and the retreat of the glacier terminus from 2005 to 2024.

Figure 4. Maps of the Prince William Sound region of Alaska showing the study area. (a) Seismic stations (red triangles) and the weather station (green circle) utilized in the study. The dashed black rectangle indicates the area used for sea surface temperature data, while the red rectangle (in panel a) outlines the map region shown in panels (b) and (c). (b) Relocated glacier quakes, color-coded by origin time, overlain with glacier terminus positions. The red square marks the center of the 50 mile (15 km) catalog search radius; glacier quakes located east of this line are classified as originating from Columbia Glacier. (c) Bathymetry (water depth) and glacier terminus positions. Geophysical Research Letters